[Piwik-hackers] installed, but hangs on 'loading data'
Anton Andrievskij
x.meglio at gmail.com
Tue Jun 3 13:23:04 CEST 2008
Hi, Matt.
I have added new method to VisitsSummary/API.php. The method is
getMultipleSites() which is the same as get() but for multiple idSite
values.
I want it to return array of values which get() returns.
In other words, I want it to return the array of arrays like this:
Array
(
[max_actions] => 0
[nb_uniq_visitors] => 0
[nb_visits] => 0
[nb_actions] => 0
[sum_visit_length] => 0
[bounce_count] => 0
)
But if I do "foreach $idSites as $idSite" and then join array like
bigResult[] = get($idSite), I get the answer from API with rubbish:
Array
(
[0] => Array
(
[0] => __PHP_Incomplete_Class Object
(
[__PHP_Incomplete_Class_Name] => Piwik_DataTable_Simple
[rows:protected] => Array
(
[0] => __PHP_Incomplete_Class Object
(
[__PHP_Incomplete_Class_Name] =>
Piwik_DataTable_Row
[c] => Array
(
[0] => Array
(
[label] => max_actions
[value] => 0
)
[1] => Array
(
)
[3] =>
)
)
[1] => __PHP_Incomplete_Class Object
(
[__PHP_Incomplete_Class_Name] =>
Piwik_DataTable_Row
[c] => Array
(
[0] => Array
(
[label] => nb_uniq_visitors
[value] => 0
)
[1] => Array
(
)
[3] =>
)
)
... etc....
.... etc...
asdf
What Piwik funcion have I to use to convert this result to something
beautiful like exmple below?
Aarray( [0] =>
Array
(
[max_actions] => 0
[nb_uniq_visitors] => 0
[nb_visits] => 0
[nb_actions] => 0
[sum_visit_length] => 0
[bounce_count] => 0
),
[1] =>
Array
(
[max_actions] => 0
[nb_uniq_visitors] => 0
[nb_visits] => 0
[nb_actions] => 0
[sum_visit_length] => 0
[bounce_count] => 0
)
.... etc etc etc.....
On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 12:48 PM, Anton Andrievskij <x.meglio at gmail.com>
wrote:
> ha-ha, Matt, I see your position.
>
> Ok. but sorry I have not time to make patches right now. I only wanted to
> say that there are many users that wan't research for bugs. They want Piwik
> working and they want quick answers to their questions.
>
> Anton
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 12:45 PM, Matthieu Aubry <matthieu.aubry at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Anton,
>> Users are always happy to help us solve more bugs. I don't have concerns
>> about it, as I've worked on open source projects for the last few years and
>> always had great help from the community.
>>
>> I'm asking for details because this is an unknown bug, something I've
>> never heard of before.
>>
>> If you're smart enough to guess what the problem is without details,
>> please send us a patch, that would be lovely!
>>
>> Matt
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 10:40 AM, Anton Andrievskij <x.meglio at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Matthieu. I advice you to be more "friendly" with Piwik users.
>>>
>>> If someone reporting a bug - do not ask him to make full research on bug
>>> and even to put it to bugs in Trac. You are getting feedback from users -
>>> it's all - and you have to thank them for this. If you ask users to research
>>> for each bug - they will not love Piwik. That is true. They need feedback
>>> and answers, they do not want to make research for your project. You can't
>>> get every users working on your project as tester and/or developer. It is
>>> wrong approach.
>>>
>>> Probably this will help you to egrow Piwik community faster. Your Piwiki
>>> must be very easy to use and self-controlled with bugs etc. If user can't
>>> run it without your help or without asking you something - than installation
>>> is not good.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Anton
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 12:33 PM, Matthieu Aubry <
>>> matthieu.aubry at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Have you tried with other browsers? Can you see some javascript errors?
>>>> Have you checked your apache error log?
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 12:01 AM, skunkwerk <skunkwerk at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> first, looks like a great project.
>>>>> i installed it smoothly and added the javascript to my site. i checked
>>>>> in the database and there was a new entry for my visit, but when i go to
>>>>> piwik and click on any of the tabs all i see is 'loading data' and it never
>>>>> loads anything. any idea why this might be?
>>>>>
>>>>> thanks,
>>>>> imran
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Piwik-hackers mailing list
>>>>> Piwik-hackers at piwik.org
>>>>> http://lists.piwik.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/piwik-hackers
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Piwik-hackers mailing list
>>>> Piwik-hackers at piwik.org
>>>> http://lists.piwik.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/piwik-hackers
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Best regards,
>>> Anton Andriyevskyy
>>>
>>> Please think about the environment
>>> and do not print this e-mail
>>> unless you really need to.
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Piwik-hackers mailing list
>>> Piwik-hackers at piwik.org
>>> http://lists.piwik.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/piwik-hackers
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Piwik-hackers mailing list
>> Piwik-hackers at piwik.org
>> http://lists.piwik.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/piwik-hackers
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Anton Andriyevskyy
>
> Please think about the environment
> and do not print this e-mail
> unless you really need to.
>
--
Best regards,
Anton Andriyevskyy
Please think about the environment
and do not print this e-mail
unless you really need to.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.piwik.org/pipermail/piwik-hackers/attachments/20080603/6f194aff/attachment.htm
More information about the Piwik-hackers
mailing list